A derivative<span> is a contract between two or more parties whose value is based on an agreed-upon underlying financial asset, index, or security. ... Similarly, a </span>stock<span>option is a </span>derivative<span> because its value is "derived" from that of the underlying</span>stock<span>.</span>
Answer:
The answer is: All the options are correct (I, II and III)
Explanation:
The larger the number of individuals (e.g. securities analysts, investors) who are informed about the price system of securities, the prices of securities will approach informational efficiency.
When the system approaches informational efficiency, you can determine which securities are riskier than others. Therefore you can price riskier securities so that they offer higher expected returns.
The other positive effect of informational efficacy is that investors can determine which securities are undervalued or overvalued.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. of fluctuations in the demand for reserves.
Explanation:
The management of the interest rate is perhaps one of the areas of economic policy that has raised the most controversy among policymakers. Much of it comes from both the interpretation of the role that the interest rate plays in macroeconomic adjustment, and the real possibility of achieving effective control over it.
Regarding the role of the interest rate, there are opposing positions about the influence that this variable may have on that of termination of savings investment. Thus, for example, from a Keynesian perspective, a weak relationship is raised between saving the interest rate, since it depends primarily on the level of income, while great importance is attached to this variable as a determinant of investment. Under this scheme, control over the interest rate can be justified since it would have the advantage of stimulating economic activity through greater investment, without significantly affecting savings levels.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
"<span>B) Resource use, production, and distribution of goods and services" is the correct answer. Economics is really a study of limited resources, and how people make choices. </span>
