Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer: Taxing citizens
Explanation:Fiscal policy relates to decisions that determine whether a government will spend more or less than it receives. ... Under the balanced-budget regime, personal and business tax rates were raised during periods of declining economic activity to ensure that government revenues were not reduced.
The United States currently has approximately 150 embassies located in foreign countries. Embassies facilitate relations between foreign powers and the United States by providing official points of contact between foreign powers and the US. The Ambassador functions more or less like a direct personal representative of the head of government, the president in this case. The Ambassador, by living in the foreign nation, helps the US gain a deeper understanding of the nation's culture and standard procedures, thus facilitating the interaction between the US and said foreign nations such like treaties, negotiations and visits.
Answer:
State Bank will suffer the loss on the check with the forged signature, while United will suffer it on the check with the forged endorsement.
Explanation:
When the signature of a drawer is forged, the drawer has not been negligent, and the drawee bank paid the check with the forged signature, it is the drawee bank who has to bear the loss, as it has to recredit the account of the affected drawer. On the other hand, when talking about a check with a forged endorsement, it is the bank that paid the check who suffer the loss. It must recredit the drawer's account, while the drawee bank can actually ask to recover the amount from the bank that paid the check.
In this case, State Bank was the drawee bank for both checks, but it only has to recredit Pauline for the check with the forged signature. United is responsible for recrediting Pauline for the check with the forged endorsement, however, while State Bank can recover the amount from them. State Bank and United can try to recover their losses from Nick, but this can prove very difficult.
Georgia was the last colony to be established. It was formed as a debtor colony since there was an overcrowding of debtors in England, they moved to Georgia to work off their debt. This system to work off your debt was James Oglethorpe's idea and it failed.
