Answer:
The answer is NO
The question is important because it determines whether a student has been ban or not. That is, under the law Ina 214(M), a student may not receive an F1 visa to attend a public basic school or middle class at all, and cannot access the F1 visa too to attend public high schools except it will be for less than twelve months and the school get to be reimbursed the cost of the total package of the education
Explanation:
The correct answer is: "people can be analyzed into basic parts."
Humanists would never believe that a person can be analyzed in a measurable and objective way or completely understood by diving the whole human being into observable parts.
In opposition, humanism is a philosophical stream that aims to highlight the inner value of human beings, both individually and in groups, by using critical thinking and without involving dogmas or superstitions (therefore, it is a secular movement, not connected to religious beliefs).
I just looked it up and the closet answer is the third one
The federal court has the power to intervene if they deem that the state circuit is incorrect.
The correct answer is B. The Court outlawed de jure segregation.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education was a legal case in 1954, in this, Oliver Brown and other African American parents sued the Board of Education for the segregation in schools as African-American children had to attend school at a different building than other children. This situation was common by then and it was part of the de jure segregation or the segregation supported by law as before the Brown v. Board of Education case segregation was allow if the services provided were equal. However, with the Brwon v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court established this segregation was unconstitutional and therefore it outlawed de jure segregation.
