All categories

3 years ago

It may be unethical for a company to refuse to negotiate liability claims for alleged injuries because of a faulty product.

1 answer:

8 0

True. It may be unethical for a company to refuse to negotiate liability claims for alleged injuries because of a faulty product.

If a company produces and sells a fault product, they are liable for what happens next. If a customer was hurt when using the product correctly, they are at fault. Ethically and morally correct would be to stand up for their product, accept responsibility and help the customer.

You might be interested in

The grant available to third-or fourth-year college students majoring in

Marrrta [24]

<u>The grant available to third-or fourth-year college student:</u>

The National Science & Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grant (National SMART Grant) is the grant given to the third or fourth year college students who want to do major in scientific or mathematical fields like physical, life, engineering, mathematics, medical, languages, etc.

To apply for the SMART grant students apply through free application of federal student aid and then if they receive the grant they can do their higher studies in their preferable fields which come under SMART grant.

5 0

3 years ago

How do office assistants show enthusiasm?

sammy [17]

Answer:

I think things you can do to show enthusiasm are:

1. showing in your work (even if it is not your favorite)

2. Think on the bright side.

3. Smile, sit up straight, make eye contact with co-workers, and talk in a upbeat manner.

Hope this helps!!!

7 0

2 years ago

Choose the preferred sentence from each pair and justify your choice. a. (1) Lindsay's request to telecommute was denied, but sh

mr_godi [17]

Answer:

(2). Although her request to telecommute was denied, Lindsay will begin a flextime schedule in two weeks.

Explanation:

The second choice would be the most preferred as it conveys the idea in a formal and precise manner. <u>The complex sentence beginning with the subordinate clause already hints the listener that the key message is yet to come. It helps him/her in understanding the intended message without any confusion</u>. The first sentence fails to create that specificity as it connects two independent ideas which remove the listener's focus from the main idea i.e. 'she will begin a flextime schedule in two weeks.' Thus, option (2) adopts the correct format and sentence structure to deliver the message effectively, efficiently, and precisely.

4 0

2 years ago

All of the following are true about selling a listed security "short against the box" EXCEPT: (A) It may be done to arbitrage (B

Alla [95]

Answer:

C. It is done to postpone taxes to a future date

Explanation:

Selling short against the box can no longer be done to defer tax to the next tax period

4 0

3 years ago

Machines A and B are mutually exclusive and have the following investment and operating costs. Machine A has a life of 3 years w

olganol [36]

Answer:

$-1081.01

$-2536.89

Explanation:

Equivalent annual cost method is a capital budgeting method used to choose between two projects with an unequal life span

The decision rule is to choose the product with the higher Equivalent annual cost

Equivalent annual annuity method is better for making this decision because if net present value is used, the project with the higher useful life would be chosen. this does not mean it is more profitable

EAA = $\frac{r(NPV)}{1 - \frac{1}{(1+ r)^{n} } }$

Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.

NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator

Machine A

Cash flow in year 0 = - $5,000

Cash flow in year 1 = $800

Cash flow in year 2 = $900

Cash flow in year 3 = $1,000

I = 9%

NPV A = -2736.35

Machine B

Cash flow in year 0 = -$6,000

Cash flow in year 1 = $850

Cash flow in year 2 = $900

I = 9%

NPV B = -4462.67

EAA =

(0.09 x -2736.35) / ( 1 - (1.09)^3) = $-1081.01

(0.09 x -4462.67) / ( 1 - (1.09)^2)= $-2536.89

3 0

2 years ago

It may be unethical for a company to refuse to negotiate liability claims for alleged injuries because of a faulty product.​

It may be unethical for a company to refuse to negotiate liability claims for alleged injuries because of a faulty product.