No solution of the system of equations y = -2x + 5 and -5y = 10x + 20 ⇒ 2nd answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us revise the types of solutions of a system of linear equations
- One solution
- No solution when the coefficients of x and y in the two equations are equal and the numerical terms are different
- Infinitely many solutions when the coefficients of x , y and the numerical terms are equal in the two equations
∵ y = -2x + 5
- Add 2x to both sides
∴ 2x + y = 5 ⇒ (1)
∵ -5y = 10x + 20
- Subtract 10x from both sides
∴ -10x - 5y = 20
- Divide both sides by -5
∴ 2x + y = -4 ⇒ (2)
∵ The coefficient of x in equation (1) is 2
∵ The coefficient of x in equation (2) is 2
∴ The coefficients of x in the two equations are equal
∵ The coefficient of y in equation (1) is 1
∵ The coefficient of y in equation (2) is 1
∴ The coefficients of y in the two equations are equal
∵ The numerical term in equation (1) is 5
∵ The numerical term in equation (2) is -4
∴ The numerical terms are different
From the 2nd rule above
∴ No solution of the system of equations
No solution of the system of equations y = -2x + 5 and -5y = 10x + 20
Learn more:
You can learn more about the system of equations in brainly.com/question/6075514
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
5/6
Step-by-step explanation:
11/12 - 1/12 = 10/12
10 divided by 2 = 5
12 divided by 2 = 6
5/6
Answer:
i. weight of wastage(kg) = 179.775 kg
ii. weight of rice cultivated = 765 kg - 179. 775 kg = 585.225 kg
percentage of rice cultivated = 100 - 23.5 = 76.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
A land of 1000 sq. meter is used to cultivate 765 kg of rice with wastage of 23.5%.
i. The wastage in percentage is 23.5% but the weight of the wastage in weight is 23.5% of 765 kg
weight of wastage = 23.5/100 × 765
weight of wastage = 17977.5/100
weight of wastage(kg) = 179.775 kg
ii. weight and percentage of rice cultivated.
weight of rice cultivated = 765 kg - 179. 775 kg = 585.225 kg
percentage of rice cultivated = 100 - 23.5 = 76.5%
Answer:
2y - 6
Step-by-step explanation:
5y - 3(y + 2)
distribute
5y + (-3 * y) + (-3 * 2)
simplify
5y -3y + ( -3 * 2)
5y - 3y + ( -6)
5y - 3y - 6
combine like terms
5-3 = 2
2y - 6
Answer:
I think it is the second one because -4 is the least
Step-by-step explanation: