One problem with this hypothesis is that the student didn't write about why this hypothesis might work - what is the underlying mechanism. The thing is that one might want to write the underlying mechanism or explanation in his hypothesis. Another problem with this hypothesis is that it's very hard to measure and be sure that following exposure to white chocolate, people are happier and that it's not a consequence of something else.
Answer:
Which of the following, if discovered to be true, would most seriously weaken the support for the researchers’ prediction?
The correct answear is B. Naltrexone inhibits morphine from triggering the migration of intestinal bacteria into the bloodstream.
Explanation:
Naltrexone is a non-selective opioid antagonist, it competes with these at the level of the receptors and thus reduces their effects.
The responses A, C, D and E does not weaken the support for the
researches ´ predictions, and are not relevant to the argument.
After my research the answer is that they are forms of electromagnetic radiation as far as I know.
Answer:
Loss of cell plate formation and production of multinuclear monads.
Explanation:
The inhibition of cell-plate formation during cytokinesis will inhibit the development of the phragmoplast which function as a scaffold for cell plate assembly and this will not allow for the formation of a new cell wall needed to separate the two new daughter cells leading to loss of cell plate formation and giving rise to multinuclear monads.
The largest energy component comes from the fats in bacon and fried eggs.
