Answer:
D
Explanation:
The west like California had lots of free land and gold which gave the americans a chance to own and prosper land.
Answer:
1. Cartography
2. Navigational compass
3.Photography
4. Internet
Explanation:
Cartography: is a method of designing, creating and studying geographic locations on flat surfaces like maps. This scientific method dates to some thousands of years ago. It dates to pre-historic times as far back as 2300 BCE when the Babylonians represented locations in clay tablets.
Navigational compass: is thought to have originated in the Han Dynasty in China between the 2nd century BC and the 1st century AD. Then it was used for fortune-telling and was called the "South Pointing Fish." It was adapted as a navigational compass in the Song Dynasty in the 11th century.
Photography: This originated in the 19th century precisely the late 1830's when Nicéphore Niépce captured the pewter plate exposed t light and coated with bitumen. In the later part of the century, geographers began adapting it to their work.
Internet: the inventions of computers in the 1950's came along with the internet that has been a useful resource for geographers.
Answer:
CTEVT is an organization of the Council for Technical Education and Vocational Training. Their functions in the context of the development of Nepal are the following:
Explanation:
1. Advise the Government of Nepal concerning TEVT policy and programs.
2. Establish the extent and standards of TEVT programs.
3. Coordinate and supervise the TEVT Programs from the primary stage to higher education.
4. Develop the technical input to create the TVET Fund
5. Create beneficial synergy with and among TVET Stakeholders
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
