Answer:
I dont know how this works but did u try 30
Explanation:
I thing bc your saying increase your adding on to soo yeah....
Answer:
The Answer is C.
Explanation:
Why did I choose C? Let's break it down.
1st of all, your aim is to promote a "greater sense of fairness among your employee".
This puts option A out of the box. If the employees are doing good and you try to find support for giving lower evaluations, certainly it will not work and employees will resist this, leading to unnecessary conflicts.
Option B is from my point of view, Silly! You tell them that the company can't pay enough and ask employees to file grievances? Like when did that work out? If this to work, when you file for grievances, the company should magically get cash and able to pay you!
You can go for the Option D and stay away from the whole scenario, yet this is not a solution at all. Isn't it? So we can throw it out of the window too.
Option C is the most logical one, since you carry out the evaluation sincerely and then give your employees a true explanation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Given
Consumption = (10 x 30) = 300
Investment = (100 x 2) = 200
Government Spending = (500 x 1) =500
13. Total GDP for this economy = Consumption + Investment+ Government spending
=(10 x 30) + (100 x 2) + (500 x 1)
=$1000
14. Consumption % on GDP
= Consumption/ Total GDP x 100
=(300/1000) x 100
= 30%
15. Investment % in GDP
= Investment / Total GDP x 100
=(200/ 1000) x 100
=20%
16. Government spending % on GDP
=Government spending/ Total GDP x 100
=(500/1000) x 100
=50%
Answer:
Consider the following analysis.
Explanation:
<em>Journal Entries
</em>
- Income tax expense.............$4,0000,000
- Deferred tax liability (10 million - 7 million )*40%........$1,200,00
- Income tax payable (7 million * 40% )................$2,800,000
Using decimals is 4.0, 1.2, and 2.8.
Answer:
The last option
Explanation:
In cafeterias you don't get an unlimited amount of what you want. Sometimes you don't even get what you want.