Mayo predicted that a group with negative behaviors and few social bonds would have very little chance of succeeding at the task.
<h3>What are
negative behaviors?</h3>
Negative behaviors are behaviors that can cause negative energy towards a particular task in an organization, and this can bring delay in achieving the goals of the organization.
In this case, Mayo predicted that a group with negative behaviors and few social bonds would have very little chance of succeeding at the task.
Learn more about negative behaviors at:
brainly.com/question/11762807
#SPJ1
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
The United States government functions under the principle of checks and balances. This means that each branch of government has a power that keeps the other branches from becoming too controlling. The branches are separate but equal.
Hope this helps!!
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
The answer to this question is Media Monopolies.
Media monopolies refers to a situation where a certain company gained fully control on a certain segment of the market, without any worthy competitors. ESPN is known to control almost all news network regarding sport-related topics while disney control almost all chilren-related shows.
