First of all, the identity property of multiplication (which is what this is I'm assuming) is that the number 1 multiplied by any other number is that number itself. (An example would be 2 multiplied by 1, which would be two) So in this problem, this rule applies too, since 2/3 multiplied by 1 would be 2/3!
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
I would say it's not reasonable. the answer would be the first one
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide the annual salary by 12 and you'll find the monthly salary
month salary = annual salary/12
month salary = 52,750/12
month salary = 4,395.83
Her monthly salary is $4,395.83
-2x+y=5
x-3y=-30 so you can multiply the bottom equation by 2 you'll get 2x-6y=-60
-2x+y=5
2x-6y=-60 And subtract the equations. You'll get -5y=-55 y=11. Plug it in to one of the original equations. -2x+(11)=5
-2x=-6 so x=3
y=11 and x=3
Mrs Carson gives the better deal, this is becuase when i set up an inequality 48/6 and 67.50/9, i divided 48 by 2 then added 24 to 48 so i could get them both so i can see what they give, so Mrs Carson gives 72 dollars every 9 hours and thats better than 67.50.
