Answer:
<em><u>short-termism
</u></em>
Is the acting upon short term vision of the needs and problems that must be addressed. It is a problem because the vision that is important is the Long path vision.
<em><u>What is “longpath” and why did Wallach develop the concept? </u></em>
Is a concept that combines long term vision and goal oriented. Wallach develop that concept as he did not find a term that frame what is intended in the long run that was goal oriented.
<em><u>Briefly discuss each of the three ways of thinking that Wallach describes. </u></em>
Transgenerational thinking: Thinking the impact of your actions in the future generations to come.
Futures thinking: The future is not related only with better technology but with how will human relationships, moral, art and feelings like compassion will evolve.
Telos thinking: This is an invitation to think having in mind what is the "ultimate aim" of our actions as little of they might be. It is important to raise the question: how this action that I am doing now will impact or change the future in 20,50 or 100 years to come.
<em><u>How does Wallach relate the future to a part of speech?
</u></em>
Wallach make a link between Thomas Khun quote: “People don’t shift unless they have a vision of what it is they’re shifting to.” an Martin Luther King Speech of "I Have a Dream" he says that that speech is successful as it shows what is the vision of what a dream must looks like
A delivery gap is,
a. the difference between a firm's service standards and the actual service it provides
- Mabel <3
Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
DR Bonds Payable ............... $ 72,100
DR Premium on Bonds Payable (74,950 - 72,100) ...... $2,850
CR Cash ...................................... $70,100
CR Gain on Discharge of Bonds ($74,950 - $70,100) $4,850
(To record retirement of premium bond before time)
If you need any clarification do comment.
Answer:
a. Toby is not maximizing his utility
b. Toby should reduce his spending on cashew and increase his spending on peanuts.
Explanation:
a. Is Toby maximizing his total utility from the kinds of nuts? If so, explain how you know.
Toby will maximize his utility when we have:
MUp/Pp = MUc/Pc
Where;
MUp/Pp = Marginal utility of peanut divided by price of peanut = 100/10 = 10
MUc/Pc = Marginal utility of cashew divided by price of cash = 200/25 = 8
From the above, Toby is not maximizing his utility. I am able to know this because MUp/Pp > MUc/Pc (i.e. 10 > 8). An Toby will only maximize his utility when MUp/Pp = MUc/Pc.
b. If not, how should he rearrange his spending?
Since MUp/Pp > MUc/Pc (i.e. 10 > 8), Toby should reduce his spending on cashew in order to increase MUc and increase his spending on peanuts reduce MUp until MUp/Pp = MUc/Pc.