1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MAXImum [283]
4 years ago
5

Does geography determine development?

Social Studies
1 answer:
worty [1.4K]4 years ago
4 0
Yes it does because natural resources play a crucial role in deciding the shape and size of development in a country. The western countries are highly developed mainly due to profusion of minerals, vegetation, natural fishing harbours etc. Plenty of oil inside the earth in the Middle East and South America is major factor in economic development of countries of these regions. Countries free from frequent visits of natural disasters are likely to be more developed than those who face the fury of disasters much time a year. Bangladesh and Philippines are a case in point. The countries that are always beset by monsoon, floods and landslides face tough hurdles in building infrastructure and carrying out development. Factors like proximity to high mountains, deserts and wild forests hamper pace of development to a great extent.
You might be interested in
6. "Federalism has negative accepts too." Justify this statement.​
rosijanka [135]

Answer:

federalism doesn't allow people/citizens to get closer to the government. there are quite a few inequalities across states which can negatively impact citizens and the services they provide as well as each states rules. Policies in one state can very much undermine policies in another state and can also affect interstate commerce.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the text below from the U.S. Constitution:
andrew11 [14]

The way Amendment III protects the rule of law is (1.) Since it is not legal for the military to invade someone's home outside the limits of the law, citizens are protected from an unjust military.

<h3>What is the Rule of Law?</h3>

This refers to the principle that quite simply states that nobody is above the law and will be held accountable.

Hence, we can see that based on Amendment III, there is the mention of the quartering of soldiers without the consent of the owner of the house and this means that option A is correct.

Read more about rule of law here:

brainly.com/question/783836

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Why did many people support the Vietnam war and its beginning stages
Maurinko [17]
People felt threatened by communism and were afraid it could eventually reach the US and they would then loose their personal freedom. So they believed communism must be contained - and the war was a step towards containing the war.
4 0
3 years ago
How are Arizona’s American Indian tribes like separate nations? Check all that apply.
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

Each tribe is independent from one another

Each tribe is defended by its own military

Each tribe has its own government and laws

Each American Indian tribe in Arizona are like a separate nation because Each tribe land are like a sovereign state independent from one another and has it own Government, laws, orders and rules for visitors and one another.

Also, each tribe is defended by its own army. For example each tribe of Apache, Navajo, Yavapai, Hualapai and Paiute tribes of the mountains and plateaus resented the encroachment of Spanish Conquistadors on their land, and called in their military to fight against this invaders of their land but eventually the tribes were confined to government reservations.

6 0
3 years ago
Sue and Tim are arguing about the value of appointing rather than electing federal judges. Sue says the judges should be elected
algol13

The statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.

<h3>How are the Judges choosen?</h3>

In the Judiciary, the justices are often nominated by the President and confirmed by Congress and once in office, the judges can remain in their positions for life.

In practice, the Judges are not elected rather, they are appointed because of the need to make them independent of external forces.

Hence, the statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.

Read more about Judges nomination

brainly.com/question/7576271

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • After the Peloponnesus war ended Greek city states where united for many years under spartan rule. T/F
    8·1 answer
  • China's urbanization rate today is about _____ percent, compared to its 1952 rate of _____ percent.
    6·2 answers
  • WHAT LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT RUNS THE ELECTION PROCESS
    14·1 answer
  • The theory in which scientists believe that the continents have moved over time is the
    12·1 answer
  • A barometer measures_________.
    6·1 answer
  • Who felt the strongest disliking Bradburn
    14·1 answer
  • Freedom of the press means what?
    9·2 answers
  • Why do you think people become archaeologists? why is it so exciting when new discoveries are made?
    12·1 answer
  • What are the pros and cons of Private military contracts (PMC) or mercenaries?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the other possiblities of development in nepal​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!