<span>It is called
emotion-focused coping. This type of
coping involves efforts to regulate the emotions that a person experienced
because of a certain stressful event.</span>
The recurring negative thought
focused on the stressor is called emotional distress.
<span>The emotional-approach
coping also involves focusing on, clarifying, and working through emotions.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
The emotional intelligence is said to include at least three skills 1.)emotional awareness, or the ability to identify and name one's own emotions,
2.)the ability to percieve and express those emotions and use them to solve problems
3.)The ability to manage emotions, which includes both regulating and motivating self emotions, people with high emotional intelligence understands their emotions and they don't let their feelings rule them. They understand and reason with emotions.
Emotional intelligence also include motivation, empathy, social skills and self regulation
Answer:
This scenario best illustrates the defense mechanism called sublimation.
Explanation:
Sublimation is replacing socially unacceptable impulses with socially acceptable behavior. For instance, Jeff is channeling aggressive drives into practicing boxing. Thus, sport is an example of putting our emotions (e.g. aggression) into something constructive.
Answer: non-comparable decisions
Explanation:
This involves the process of making decisions about products or services from different categories. Hence making comparison among them difficult.
In this case, Linda and Cindy will have to make an overall evaluation of each option; using pros and cons for each activity. Both of them come to an unanimous decision.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
