Performing duties in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, and technical standards comprise the IMA professional ethics standard of: <u>competance</u>.
Members of IMA are expected to act morally. A dedication to moral professional conduct entails broad concepts that embody our beliefs and standards that direct member behaviour.
The fundamental ethics standard of IMA are: Honesty, Fairness, Objectivity, and Responsibility. Members are expected to follow these guidelines and to inspire others in their organisations to do the same.
The Competence, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Credibility criteria must be followed and upheld by IMA members. If you don't comply, you can face disciplinary action.
To learn more about IMA standard of Competence, refer
brainly.com/question/14512303
#SPJ4
Answer:
a)by increasing israel import
I believe the answer is: Learn Korean so she can teach in the students' L1 for consistency with their previous courses.
By learning Korean, Karen provide the possibilities for her students to hear the explanation of English language using the home language that they are familiar with. This would make it much more easier for the students to spot their mistake and improve their overall proficiency.
Answer:
a. Identity versus role confusion
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Amanda seems to be in the Identity versus role confusion stage of psychosocial development. This is the stage in which an teenager begins to ask "Who am I", and struggles between finding the values and ideas that represent them and their way of thinking. Which is why Amanda begins to feel passion when she finds something that feels right to her and her beliefs.
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.