Answer:
A partnership's allocations of income and deductions to the partners are required to be proportionate to the partners' percentage ownership of partnership profits in order to meet the substantial economic effect tests.
True
Explanation:
Equity and equality must be put in place as a yardstick to allocate such which would bring a common ground for both parties.
Answer:
6,000 units
Explanation:
The beginning inventory units are calculated below
We know
Number of units produced = Budgeted units sold + ending inventory units - beginning inventory units
35,000 units = 32,000 units + 9,000 units - beginning inventory units
35,000 units = 41,000 units - beginning inventory units
So, the beginning inventory units would be
= 41,000 units - 35,000 units
= 6,000 units
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A currency appreciates when its value increases.
For example if $1 was exchanged for 50 pesos. After appreciation of the pesos, $1 would buy $25 pesos.
So more $2 would be needed to buy 50 peso after the appreciation when before the appreciation $1 was buying 50 pesos.
As a result Mexican goods would become more expensive to US consumers and the revenue earned by Mexican producers would increase
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
