Answer:
6 questions
Step-by-step explanation:
30 x 0.2 = 6
Answer:
1:4
Step-by-step explanation:
3:12
((3×1):(3×4))
=1:4
(would love if you could mark me the brainliest :))
<span>v = 45 km/hr
u = 72 km/hr
Can't sketch the graph, but can describe it.
The Y-axis will be the distance. At the origin it will be 0, and at the highest point it will have the value of 120. The X-axis will be time in minutes. At the origin it will be 0 and at the rightmost point, it will be 160. The graph will consist of 3 line segments. They are
1. A segment from (0,0) to (80,60)
2. A segment from (80,60) to (110,60)
3. A segment from (110,60) to (160,120)
The motorist originally intended on driving for 2 2/3 hours to travel 120 km. So divide the distance by the time to get the original intended speed.
120 km / 8/3 = 120 km * 3/8 = 360/8 = 45 km/hr
After traveling for 80 minutes (half of the original time allowed), the motorist should be half of the way to the destination, or 120/2 = 60km. Let's verify that.
45 * 4/3 = 180/3 = 60 km.
So we have a good cross check that our initial speed was correct. v = 45 km/hr
Now having spent 30 minutes fixing the problem, out motorist now has 160-80-30 = 50 minutes available to travel 60 km. So let's divide the distance by time:
60 / 5/6 = 60 * 6/5 = 360/5 = 72 km/hr
So the 2nd leg of the trip was at a speed of 72 km/hr</span>
Answer:
C. Ratio
True for this case we have a clear definition of the 0 since the 0 for the heigth and the weigth represent absence of mass. And the differences between numerical values for the two variables are meaingful.
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to know which type of variable represent the weigth and the height. Let's analyze one by one the options given:
A. Ordinal
False since by definition an ordinal variable is "is a categorical variable for which the possible values are ordered". And for this case the height and the weigth are not categorical since represent quantitative data.
B. Nominal
False by definition and ordinal variable is which one that can't be represented by numeric values, and for this case the weight and the height are not example of this definition.
C. Ratio
True for this case we have a clear definition of the 0 since the 0 for the heigth and the weigth represent absence of mass. And the differences between numerical values for the two variables are meaingful.
D. Interval
False on this scale we don't have a clear definition of the 0. And for this case the heigth and the weight have a known definition of the 0 corresponding to the absence of mass. And since the ratios are meaingful for the heigth and the weigth then can't be an interval variable.
Answer:
- Long leg = 10√3
- Short leg = 10
- Hypotenuse = 20
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Concept: </u>
Here, we need to know the idea of a special triangle 30-60-90.
A special right triangle is a right triangle with some regular feature that makes calculations on the triangle easier, or for which simple formulas exist.
The ratio between the corresponding side of each angle is 1 : √3 : 2
If you are still confused, please refer to the attachment below for a graphical explanation.
<u>Solve:</u>
30-60-90 ⇔ 1 : √3 : 2
Given the side corresponding to 90° is 20
30° : 90° = 1 : 2
30° : 20 = 1 : 2
30° = 10
30° : 60° = 1 : √3
10 : 60° = 1 : √3
60° = 10√3
Hope this helps!! :)
Please let me know if you have any questions
