Answer:
Brief summary of the case:
The case deals about the evolution of kindle by Company A. When the company decided to introduce kindle, its price was $399 in 2007. Company A understood that to be successful against the huge competitors, kindle must be priced low. It must be highly reliable, many features and elegance must be provided in the design of kindle. "Company A- designed kindle in State C where the research and development expertise is available.
Market research firm "IS," estimated that the manufacturing cost of kindle is about $185. The expensive components of the kindle are the display used in the Electronic ink technology and wireless cord. Company A contracted with Country C's company to produce the display. A manufacturer in Continent A produced a wireless cord of $13. Many components were contracted to the different countries to reduce the cost of the kindle to be competitive. Now, kindle became the competitor to the massive companies.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Electronic reader K in Country U:
If Company had decided to manufacture all the components in Country U, then it would have been more expensive. Company A cannot sell that at an affordable price. Increase in the cost of the components would increase the overall cost of the Electronic reader K. The most important strategy of Company A is to minimize the cost of the product to increase the number of sales.
Increase in the manufacturing cost will dilute their competitive advantage and it increases the cost of the product. It will lower the sales and the buyers would prefer to use the competitors' products, which are cheaper.
Determine if the company has decided to manufacture all the components of Tablet F in Country U:
It would be expensive if they decide to manufacture the components in Country U. It will not affect the sales number like Electronic reader K. as Tablet F is multipurpose. People will prefer quality and specifications than price.
Conclusion:
Manufacturing in Country U would be expensive and it increases the overall cost of the product. It would affect sales of the products.
Ignoring some safety regulations in order save $1 Million per day. The amount that those violations end up costing the company is $100 Billion.
<h3>What is safety regulation?</h3>
Safety regulation can be defined as a set of rules and regulation that an employees are mandated to follow so as to prevent work hazard.
Based on the given scenario ignoring the safety regulation so as to save $1 million per day will cost the company $100 Billion.
Which is why companies made it compulsory for employees to follow the saftey standard set so as to ensures that employees work in a safe and conducive environment .
Inconclusion the amount that those violations end up costing the company is $100 Billion.
Learn more about Safety regulation here:brainly.com/question/8430576
Answer:
Retained earning balance at the end would be = $205,000
Explanation:
Retained earnings at the end = Retained earning at the beginning + Net income - Dividend paid
The net income would increase the balance of the retained earnings hence it is added to it.
The Dividend paid would be a cash outflow which would reduce the balance of the retained earnings, hence it is deducted from it.
So applying this to the question, we have
Retained earning balance at the end would be:
25,000 + 200,000 - 20,000 = $205,000
Retained earning balance at the end would be = $205,000
Answer:
$7,514
Explanation:
Calculation for how Legion should report bond interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021
Using this formula
Bond interest expense=Bonds amount*Priced to yield percentage
Bond interest expense=$150,272*(10%/2)
Bond interest expense=$150,272*5%
Bond interest expense=$7,513.6
Bond interest expense=$7,514 Approximately
Therefore Legion should report bond interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021 in the amount of $7,514
