Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
D: 11
Step-by-step explanation:
When I evaluated the expression, I got 11.
Hope it helps! :D
It rotates 180 degrees because its like 90 +90+180
180+90=270
Answer:
B
) Negative
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression 3xy
when x>0 and y<0
The value of the expression 3xy will be negative.
This is because the product of a positive and negative number will always be negative.
For illustration,
Let x=5>0 and y=-5<0
3xy=3(5)(-5)=-75
NOTE:
Answer:
(42-24n)
Step-by-step explanation:
(7-4n)×6
take the 6 and multiply it to the integers in the paraenthesis.
so you take the ouside number which is 6 and multiply it with the first number which is 7 in the paraenthesis.
6×7=42
(42-4n)
then take the next number 4n and multiply by 6
4n × 6 = 24n
finally put it all together
(42-24n)
sorry if that didnt help
