All categories

3 years ago

How do you turn a fraction to a decimal

Mathematics

2 answers:

Sindrei [870]3 years ago

7 0

Divide the numerator by the denominator so for example if you had 1/2 you would divide 1 by 2 to get 0.5

DaniilM [7]3 years ago

7 0

By dividing the fraction numbers.

You might be interested in

Which of the following expressions is equivalent to 3 m ( m − 2 ) − ( m ^2 + 1 ) ?

leonid [27]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me with question 24 ‍♀️

love history [14]

for answer 2 is A=1/32

for answer 1 is=A=4.8

hope that helps you

3 0

3 years ago

Rodney rented a machine for $70.00 to make popcorn at a school event. In addition to the machine rental cost, the popcorn suppli

Olin [163]

Answer:

100$

Step-by-step explanation:

he profit from 1 popcorn=0.85$

from 200=170$

170$-70$=100

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the value of C-F

photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

The sweat chloride reference value is less than 30 mmol/L. A value of more than 60 mmol/L of chloride in the sweat is consistent with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The values of 30-60 mEq/L may represent heterozygous carriers, these carriers cannot be accurately identified with a sweat chloride test.

4 0

3 years ago

A manufacturer uses production method to produce steel rods. A random sample of 17 steel rods resulted in lengths with a standar

Arisa [49]

Answer:

$\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87$

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates $\alpha/2 =0.05$ of the area on each tail and we got:

$\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962$

$\chi^2_{crit}=26.296$

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

$p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92$

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Data provided

$n=17$ represent the sample selected

$\alpha=0.1$ represent the significance

$s^2 =4.7^2 =22.09$ represent the sample variance

$\sigma^2_0 =3.5^2 =12.15$ represent the value to check

Null and alternative hypothesis

We want to verify if the new production method has lengths with a standard deviation different from 3.5 cm, so the system of hypothesis would be:

Null Hypothesis: $\sigma^2 = 12.15$

Alternative hypothesis: $\sigma^2 \neq 12.15$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$\chi^2 =\frac{n-1}{\sigma^2_0} s^2$

The degrees of freedom are:

$df =n-1= 17-1=16$

$\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87$

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates $\alpha/2 =0.05$ of the area on each tail and we got:

$\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962$

$\chi^2_{crit}=26.296$

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

$p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92$

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

7 0

3 years ago