Answer:
yes I agree
Explanation:
<em>because</em><em> </em><em>different</em><em> </em><em>organizations</em><em> </em><em>manufacture </em><em>or </em><em>provide </em><em>different</em><em> </em><em>goods </em><em>and </em><em>services</em><em> </em><em>so </em><em>it's </em><em>not </em><em>possible</em><em> </em><em>for </em><em>them </em><em>to </em><em>have </em><em>the </em><em>same </em><em>planning</em><em> </em><em>practices </em><em>take </em><em>for instance</em><em> </em><em>an </em><em>organization</em><em> </em><em>that </em><em>deals </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>provision </em><em>of </em><em>food </em><em>to </em><em>refugees</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>an </em><em>organization</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>deals </em><em>with </em><em>the </em><em>manufacturing</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>goods</em><em> </em><em>these </em><em>two </em><em>organizations</em><em> </em><em>will </em><em>plan </em><em>differently</em><em> </em><em>on </em><em>how </em><em>to </em><em>go </em><em>about </em><em>with </em><em>there </em><em>businesses</em><em>.</em>
<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em>
Answer:
Both b. and c.
That is
b. i’m sorry, but the transfer disclosure statement covers all material facts that must be disclosed, and a person having aids is not a material fact, whether or not it would be applicable in this situation.
c. i’m sorry, but i am not permitted to answer this question, as it could be a potential civil rights violation, under the federal and state fair housing laws.
Explanation:
In the given instance the buyer if the property is asking if the previous tenant had AIDS and wants to use this information in the purchasing process. This is illegal and could result in legal action due to civil rights violation. Discrimination is not allowed in deciding to do business with another party, and the buyer is trying to discriminate on the grounds that the previous owner had AIDS.
Also in disclosing relevant information, wether the previous owner had AIDS is irrelevant to the sale of the house as it does not affect the quality of the house.
i think it's" B" , from the explanation!
Explanation:
Free trade increases the size of the economy as a whole. It allows goods and services to be produced more efficiently. ... Free trade is good for consumers. It reduces prices by eliminating tariffs and increasing competition. Greater competition is also likely to improve quality and choice.
The answer is exclusive distribution. This is exclusive when just certain retailers are given the alternative of conveying an item in its store. In this way, it is an understanding between a provider and a retailer giving the retailer elite rights inside a particular land region to convey the provider's item.
Before going to the cost and benefits, lets take a look first at the total of what Tim makes for the two jobs. In the first job, he is paid $7 per hour for 3 hours so that is $21 total for the first job. The second job offer is $10 per hour for two hours so that is $20 for the entire second job offer. If he is going to take the first job, he will have $1 more than the second job, however, he has to work an extra hour. However, if he takes the second job, he receives $1 less but has one hour more for himself. So if he were to take the second job, it will be more beneficial to him because he can get almost the same amount but doesn't need to work as hard
