1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mamont248 [21]
3 years ago
14

Which factor best explains the urbanization of texas after world war II

History
1 answer:
Bingel [31]3 years ago
8 0
The last five decades of the twentieth century witnessed the transformation of Texas from a rural and agricultural state to an urban, industrial one.
You might be interested in
In a complete paragraph 7 sentence answer the following question:in what ways did reconstruction expand and limit the right of A
mr Goodwill [35]
Reconstruction expanded the rights of african americans by abolishing slavery. they limited the rights because the black codes didn't allow them to own guns or own land. i hope this helped! if i didn't i can explain further.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is an issue that is debated by modern-day sociologists?
o-na [289]

Answer:

C. The appropriate balance between observing social injustice and seeking social justice.

Explanation:

This issue is strongly debated by modern-day sociologists, because our social order seems to be innately unjust. There are people who start from worse premises than others, there are people who earn less than others and people who will earn more and there is no society without inequality.

<em>This inequality is considered "social injustice" by modern-day sociologists and philosophers, whereas other voices claim that this kind of "injustice" is not something which can be corrected. </em>

<em>The main idea is that there will always be inequalities in any given society. </em>However, <u>the big question is how big these inequalities should be and how much state interference should there be to diminish these inequalities? </u>Moreover, even with state interference, could inequalities ever be wiped out?

This is what modern-day sociologists are trying to answer, in order to build better societies without imposing too many things on individuals who are faring better than others just by birth.

5 0
3 years ago
Why would democracy suffer if citizens didnt participate ​
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

A democracy has a president and people who vote for specific and various things.

Explanation:

If no one is voting, then how are we supposed to know what the people want. I hope this answered your question. If not, lemme know

8 0
3 years ago
20) According to Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation, what percentage of votes by the states was required to ratify any
Lyrx [107]

Answer:

C a unanimous vote

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
How did the fugitive slave law serve to strengthen the south? Pls tell me
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century. Statutes regarding refugee slaves existed in America as early as 1643 and the New England Confederation, and slave laws were later enacted in several of the 13 original colonies. Among others, New York passed a 1705 measure designed to prevent runaways from fleeing to Canada, and Virginia and Maryland drafted laws offering bounties for the capture and return of escaped slaves.

By the time of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, many Northern states including Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut had abolished slavery.

Concerned that these new free states would become safe havens for runaway slaves, Southern politicians saw that the Constitution included a “Fugitive Slave Clause.” This stipulation (Article 4, Section 2, Clause 3) stated that, “no person held to service or labor” would be released from bondage in the event they escaped to a free state. Despite the inclusion of the Fugitive Slave Clause in the U.S. Constitution, anti-slavery sentiment remained high in the North throughout the late 1780s and early 1790s, and many petitioned Congress to abolish the practice outright.

Bowing to further pressure from Southern lawmakers—who argued slave debate was driving a wedge between the newly created states—Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793.

This edict was similar to the Fugitive Slave Clause in many ways, but included a more detailed description of how the law was to be put into practice. Most importantly, it decreed that slave owners and their “agents” had the right to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states.

In the event they captured a suspected slave, these hunters had to bring them before a judge and provide evidence proving the person was their property. If court officials were satisfied by their proof—which often took the form of a signed affidavit—the owner would be permitted to take custody of the slave and return to their home state. The law also imposed a $500 penalty on any person who helped harbor or conceal escaped slaves.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was immediately met with a firestorm of criticism. Northerners bristled at the idea of turning their states into a stalking ground for bounty hunters, and many argued the law was tantamount to legalized kidnapping. Some abolitionists organized clandestine resistance groups and built complex networks of safe houses to aid slaves in their escape to the North.

Explanation:

basically: Following increased pressure from Southern politicians, Congress passed a revised Fugitive Slave Act in 1850. Part of Henry Clay's famed Compromise of 1850—a group of bills that helped quiet early calls for Southern secession—this new law forcibly compelled citizens to assist in the capture of runaway slaves.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The first governing document created by the colonists combined the states into a loose confederate union where the primary sourc
    14·1 answer
  • As a result of the stamp act, the virginia assembly sponsored the virginia resolves, which declared the principle of
    11·1 answer
  • After nearly 200 years of existence, the Persian Empire was conquered by which ruler, who controlled most of the western world i
    14·2 answers
  • How would you describe child labor in one word?
    12·2 answers
  • Being a patriotic citizen means protesting unlawful or unjust government actions.
    5·2 answers
  • What Band Spoke at the United Nations?​
    9·1 answer
  • URGENT PLEASE HELP!!!! GIVING BRAINLIEST!! If you answer this correctly ill answer some of your questions you have posted! (33pt
    5·1 answer
  • COMO LAS REFORMAS RIVADAVIANAS INTENTARON MODERNIZAR A LA SOCIEDAD BONAERENSE Y PONER FIN A LA ANARQUÍA DEL AÑO XX?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was, and still is, part of the mission of the NAACP?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the inquisition prevent people from converting to protestantism?.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!