Answer:
Option B fits perfectly,$1.61
Explanation:
Basis earnings per share is the total earnings attributable to common stock divided by the weighted average number of common stock in the year.
Earnings attributable to common is net income minus preferred stock dividends
Net income is $361,000
preferred stock dividend=20,100*$1.70=$ 34,170.00
earnings attributable to common stock=$361,000-$ 34,170=$ 326,830
Weighted average number of common stock is 203,000 shares
basic earnings per share= $326,830/203,000=$1.61
The correct option is B,$1.61
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
The Worthingtons have a motor home valued at $165,000.
Their car is worth $32,000.
They have investments worth $200,000.
Their savings is worth $20,000.
They have medical bills worth $1,300.
Their credit card balance is $3000.
Their net worth will be
= Assets - Liabilities
= $(165,000 + $32,000 + $200,000 + $20,000) - $(1,300 + 3000)
= $417,000 - $4,300
= $412,700
The calculation to determine the dollar amount of the markup per unit: Total cost per unit times markup percentage per unit.
Total cost, in economics, is the sum of all costs incurred by a company in generating a certain stage of output. Knowledge of the full fee involved in producing their output lets a business have better knowledge of their profitability and efficiency. This may allow an organization to determine whether or not they want to reevaluate their pricing approach, reduce expenses or take different steps to grow their profitability.
Markup percentage is a percent markup over the cost fee to get the promoting price and is calculated as a ratio of gross income to the price of the unit. The amount of markup allowed to the store determines the money he makes from promoting each unit of the product. Better the markup, extra the price to the purchaser, and extra the cash the store makes.
Learn more about Total cost here brainly.com/question/14332852
#SPJ4
Answer:
D) Both the landowner and the attorney.
Explanation:
The bank will succeed in obtaining a judgement against both the former landowner and the attorney. The bank can sue either of them or both of them, but it can only collect the $5,000 once.
- When the attorney assumed the mortgage, he expressly promised to pay it. The lender becomes a third party beneficiary of the attorney's promise to pay and can sue him if the mortgage isn't paid.
- The former landowner became secondarily liable to the lender in case the attorney didn't pay.