1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
2 years ago
14

Suppose that everyone who has looked for a job for more than six months gave up in despair and stopped looking. What would happe

n to the unemployment rate?It would increase.It would fall.It would not change.It would change, but the effect cannot be predicted.
Business
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It would fall

Explanation:

The unemployment rate measures the amount of people who are out of a job for at least 4 weeks, and are actively seeking to find a new job. If a person is not willing or able to search for a job, he/she is not considered unemployed nor part of the labor force.

If unemployed people just quit looking for jobs, the unemployment will decrease even though the number of people who are out a job increases. This happens because as soon as someone quits looking for new job, they are not considered unemployed anymore.

You might be interested in
On December 29, 2005, BJ Co. sold an equity security investment that had been purchased on January 4, 2004. BJ owned no other ma
sineoko [7]

Answer:

AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery

No No

The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.

The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.

The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.

For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Using the following information, prepare a vertical analysis of two years' income statements. Fees Earned is $153,500 for Year 2
ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

(B) Operating income has increased as a percentage of revenue

Explanation:

Conducting a vertical analysis,

Operating income (year 1) = Fees earned, less operating expenses

= 149,700 - 127,245 = $22,455

Therefore operating income as a percentage of revenue = 22,455/149,700 = 15%.

Operating income (year 2) = 153,500 - 122,800 = $30,700

Therefore operating income as a percentage of revenue = 30,700/153,500 = 20%.

Therefore, operating income as a percentage of revenue increased from year 1 to year 2.

7 0
3 years ago
HELP FAST! What is the correct answer?!?!
Nataly [62]
The retailer/store pays the interchange rate.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the rate of return when 20 shares of Stock A purchased for \$30/share , are sold for $710? The commission on the sale is
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

ROI=17.33%

Explanation:

the rate of return = Net gain/ initial investments x 100 %

Net gains = (selling price  - commissions) -  purchase price

Purchase price = 20 x $30 = $600

Selling price = 710

Commission = $6

ROI ={( 710 - 6) - 600}/ 600 x 100

ROI = 104/600 x 100

ROI= 0.173333 x 100

ROI=17.33%

7 0
3 years ago
An employee is _________when a company purchases an insurance policy against losses from theft by that employee.
Rus_ich [418]
<span>An employee is in a BOND when a company purchases an insurance policy against losses from theft by that employee.

Every business owners are advised to bond their employees under Employee Theft Bond upon hiring. This is to protect their businesses from employee theft and avoid possible bankruptcy. Despite rigorous filtering of new hires, there is still a big possibility that employees will steal from the company especially if company transactions are mostly done in cash to cash basis. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Mr. Drexel is the manager of a shoe store in Dadeland Mall. He is always telling his employees how to do everything. If he overh
    10·1 answer
  • A sweater is on sale for 40% off the original price of $68. the sales tax rate is 7%. what is the tax on the sale price?
    10·1 answer
  • A 180-day $3 million CD has a 4.25 percent annual rate quote. If you buy the CD, how much will you collect in 180 days?
    14·1 answer
  • Colleen Mooney earned a salary of $400 for the last week of September. She will be paid on October 1. The adjusting entry for Co
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement is false?
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose Fred has a payroll check from his place of employment, Kelsey's Pub. He then endorses the back of a check and gives it t
    13·1 answer
  • Google's relaxed and non-traditional corporate culture is one aspect of which
    11·1 answer
  • A _______ lease covers the landlord's expected increases in expenses by increasing the rent on an annual basis over the life of
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement is true according to the article?Choose one:A. Chilean companies aim to improve their wine distribution in China
    6·1 answer
  • Dear sir/madam
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!