1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Charra [1.4K]
4 years ago
5

Damaris is a member of AASA. What did she most likely learn from a meeting she recently went to?

Business
2 answers:
Temka [501]4 years ago
7 0

Answer: B. there is a conference for school principals coming to town.  I hope this  helps everyone :)

I took a test so i know this answer is correct! :)

Svet_ta [14]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

there is a conference for school principals coming to town

You might be interested in
Foulds Company makes 12,000 units per year of a part it uses in the products it manufactures. The unit product cost of this part
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

a) Unit product cost relevant for decision = $41.60

b) Net dollar advantage = $49,200

c) Maximum per unit cost willing to pay = $46.60

Explanation:

As per the data given in the question,

a)

Particulars Amount

Direct materials $13.20

Direct labor $20.20

Variable manufacturing overhead $3.20

Fixed manufacturing cost $5.00 ($10.20-$5.20)

Unit product cost $41.60 ($46.80-$5.20)

Unit product cost relevant for decision = $41.60

b)

Relevant unit product cost = $41.60

Supplier offered selling price = $42.50

Additional contribution margin per year = $60,000

Production in year = 12,000 units

Net dollar advantage = ($41.60-$42.50) × 12,000 + $60,000

= $49,200

c)

Maximum per unit cost willing to pay = $42.50 + $49,200 ÷ 12,000

= $46.60

7 0
4 years ago
Firm A is very aggressive in its use of debt to leverage up its earnings for common stockholders, whereas Firm NA is not aggress
kolezko [41]

Answer:

Kindly check the because my below submission is water tight

Explanation:

First and foremost, we need to determine the net income for both companies bearing in mind that the for firm A interest expense is 12% of debt capital whereas debt capital is 50% of total capital of $180,000 since the  debt ratio(debt/total capital) of firm of Firm A is 50% and 0% for Firm NA

EBIT=$40,000

tax rate=35%

Firm A:

Debt capital=50%*$180,000=$90,000

Equity=50%*$180,000=$90,000

interest expense=$90,000*12%

interest expense=$10,800

Earnings before tax=$40,000-$10,800=$29,200

net income=earnings before-tax*(1-tax rate)

net income=$29,200*(1-35%)

net income=$18,980

return on equity=net income/equity

return on equity=$18,980/$90,000

return on equity=21.09%

Firm NA:

Equity=$180,000

debt=0%

EBIT=$40,000

no debt, no interest expense

net income=$40,000*(1-35%)

net income=$26,000

return on equity=$26,000/$180,000

return on equity=14.44%

ROEA - ROENA=21.09%-14.44%=6.65%

5 0
3 years ago
Assume that your firm consists of Division 1 (40 percent of the firm) and Division 2 (60 percent of the firm). The capital struc
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Division 1's WACC - Division 2's WACC = 11.752% - 14.6656% = - 1.9136% or Division 1 has the lower cost of capital of 1.9136% in absolute term comparing to Division 2.

Explanation:

Before starting, we need to convert unlevered beta into levered beta:

Levered beta of Division 1: 1.2 x ( 1 + (1-40%) x 0.25) = 1.38

Leverage beta of Division 2: 1.46 x ( 1+ (1-40%) x 0.25) = 1.679

Then, we start step by step as below:

First, using the CAPM model: Cost of equity = risk-free rate of return +  beta *(Market Rate of Return – Risk-free Rate of Return) , we find the cost of equity for Division 1 and Division 2.

  - Division 1's cost of Equity = 4% + 1.38 x( 12% -4%) = 15.04%

  - Division 2's cost of equity = 4% + 1.46 x (12% - 4%) = 17.432%

Second, determine the post-tax cost of debt applied for both Division: 6% x (1-tax rate) = 6% x (1 -40%) = 3.60%

Third, calculate the WACC for each Division:

  - Division 1's WACC = % of debt in capital structure x cost of debt + % of equity in capital structure x cost of equity = 20% x 3.6% + 80% x 15.04% = 11.752%;

  - Division 2's WACC = % of debt in capital structure x cost of debt + % of equity in capital structure x cost of equity = 20% x 3.6% + 80% x 17.432% = 14.6656%;

Finally, compare the WACC between the two Division:

Division 1's WACC - Division 2's WACC = 11.752% - 14.6656% = - 1.9136% or Division 1 has the lower cost of capital of 1.9136% in absolute term comparing to Division 2.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which manager shows a democratic style of functioning?
Vikentia [17]
A democratic leader shares the decision-making and most of the problem solving
3 0
3 years ago
________ is a strategy in which the salesperson provides customers with the opportunity to purchase related products or services
Ainat [17]

Answer:

Up selling

Explanation:

Up selling is a sales strategy. It is an attempt at making more sales using persuasion. It is different from cross-selling in that the customer is not asked to purchase a new item but only purchase a more expensive product or even simply an add-on to the already bought product he/she has.

While it is allowed in terms of ethical consideration to persuade the customer to purchase through up selling, it however becomes unethical when the sales person starts to push the sale. What is meant by pushing the sales refer to the use of half truth or falsehood to literally trick the customer into getting the product. This is an ethical issue and be tried in a capable court of law

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Imagine you are in the process of buying a new car. Give at least two examples of both qualitative and quantitative data that yo
    9·1 answer
  • Gekko, Inc. reported the following balances (after adjustment) at the end of 2008 and 2007.
    6·1 answer
  • A call center with access to customer credit reports selling customer data to an outside organized crime organization for the pu
    14·1 answer
  • Suppose a perfectly competitive firm's total cost of production (TC) is:
    8·1 answer
  • On March 5, Oak Corp. provided services on account to Pine. Oak initially recorded this as an account receivable but it later be
    8·1 answer
  • Tanya is buying a new phone for $989. She made a down payment of $200 and financed the remainder. What amount did she finance?
    7·2 answers
  • 1. Crane Chemicals Company acquires a delivery truck at a cost of $31,400 on January 1, 2022. The truck is expected to have a sa
    12·1 answer
  • Merchandising transactions.
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of APR?
    6·1 answer
  • Jason purchased his dream home six months ago. after jason received an inheritance from his uncle, he decided to pay off his mor
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!