$2712000 are the creditors’ claims on their assets.
The given assets = $4393000, common stock = $1077000, retained earnings = $604000, creditor's = ?
libilities = assets
creditors + common stock + retained earnings = assets
creditors + $1077000 + $604000 = $4393000
creditors + $1681000 = $4393000
creditors = $4393000 - $1681000
creditors = $2712000
Hence, creditors' claim on their assets is $2712000.
Still, a car is an assets if it's cheaper than what you paid for it because it's readily available on the market and can be turned into cash. That alone, by definition, makes it an asset. It's these additional costs and constant depreciation that make a car worthless.
Learn more about assets at
brainly.com/question/25821437
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
MTV and cable channels can have higher operating profits largely because they have lower costs and can reach very specific demographic groups quite easily. MTV and Nickleodeon are typically not paying high and uncertain prices for their shows. They air mainly reruns of proven shows or relatively low-cost reality shows. This means that they have more cost certainty.
In addition, they have very clear target audiences where the networks do not. MTV is clearly aimed at teens and young adults while Nickleodeon is a kids' channel. Advertisers are attracted to channels with such clear demographics.
As far as Porter's five forces go, the most likely reason for the higher cable profits would have to do with brand equity and the lower propensity among buyers to substitute.
These would mean that cable channels have a lower threat of new competition and a lower threat of substitute products. It is true that it is easy for a new cable channel to be created, but it is much harder for such a channel to get the name recognition and brand equity that MTV and Nickleodeon have.
Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. What stock price is expected 1 year from now?
This will be calculated as:
= P0 × (1 + g)
where,
P0 = $40
g = growth rate = 7%
= P0 × (1 + g)
= 40 × (1 + 7%)
= 40 × (1 + 0.07)
= 40 × 1.07
= $42.80
b. What is the required rate of return?
This will be:
= (D1 / P0) + g
where D1 = D0 × (1+g) = 1.75 × (1+0.07) = 1.75 × 1.07 = 1.8725
= (D1 / P0) + g
= (1.8725 / 40) + 0.07
= 0.1168
= 11.68%
