The answer is Angle Bisector.
I think this because if it were to be perpendicular the triangle would have to be congruent in SSS theorem or other.
I hope this helps!
Answer:50
Step-by-step explanation:
Plug 7 in for x
Multiply 9 by 7
Solve like normal equation
We will take an example of a rectangle with a scale factor of enlargement by 2.
For example, consider a rectangle with dimensions of 6 cm and 3 cm.
If we increase the scale factor for the initial rectangle by 2, both sides of the rectangle will be doubled. By raising the scale factor, we mean multiplying the present rectangle measurement by the supplied scale factor. We have multiplied the original rectangle measurement by 2 here.
The rectangle's length was originally 6 cm and its width was 3 cm.
After multiplying by two, the length is 12 cm and the width is 6 cm.
Thus, we took an example of a rectangle with a scale factor of enlargement by 2. We consider this for a better understanding.
To learn more about scale factors visit:
brainly.com/question/22312172
#SPJ9
Answer:
The answer is A. (4x²+3)(x+2)
Step-by-step explanation:
If u multiply (4x²+3) by (x+2), u get 4x^3+8x^2+3x+6
Carol's Steakhouse, the total cost of serving 150 customers per day is $900. Carol is interested in increasing her business, but is concerned about the effect on marginal cost.
Carol successfully increases her business to 200 customers per day. However, her total cost for doing so is 50% greater than the expected $1,600. What percent greater is the actual marginal cost than the expected marginal cost, to the nearest full perc
Answer:
214
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given
C1 = $900
Q1 = 259
Then c2 = $1600
Q2 = 200
M = 1600-900/50
= 14
For real,
C1 = 900
C2 = 2400
Q1 = 150
Q2 = 50
1500/50 = 30
30/14 x 100
= 214
It is greater by 214 percent