When Loewi triggered a nerve that affected a frog's heart rate, he was able to remove fluid from the region surrounding the heart, transfer it to another frog's heart, and subsequently affect that frog's heart rate as well.
<h3>What are Neurotransmitters?
</h3>
Neurotransmitters, which are organic compounds, play a major role in the language that neurons use to communicate with one another and with their final targets. Following electrical stimulation, these substances are produced and act on their particular receptors to start a response that can be as simple as a muscle contraction or as extremely complex as starting a chain reaction that eventually changes how the organism behaves. Neurotransmitters can have multiple functions; depending on where they act, they can be neuromodulators or, in some cases, neurohormones.
To know more about "Neurotransmitters", visit: brainly.com/question/26387085
#SPJ4
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
d. learning is useful in allowing organisms to adapt to the environment.
Explanation:
Psychologists define learning as a relatively permanent change in behavior as a result of experience. Learning can be possible through vision, hearing, reading or writing, and kinesthetic. The statement that learning is useful in allowing an organism to adapt to the environment is influential because from the day an individual is born to death, every day we tend to learn each day either by imitating our elders or by modeling our role models.
Answer: The right to privacy
Explanation: