Answer:
-3
Step-by-step explanation:
If we directly evaluate the function at -1, we get 0/0, meaning we may still have a limit to find.
In this case, factoring the polynomial at the top would be helpful.
The polynomial can be factored to (x+1)(x-2), so the function would now turn out to be (x+1)(x-2)/(x+1)
The (x+1) cancel out, leaving you with (x-2), which you can directly evaluate by plugging in x as -1:
-1-2 = -3
Quick disclaimer: the function is still undefined at -1; it's just that the function gets closer and closer to -3 as you approach -1.
I hope this helped you.
Answer:
(-4,5)
*View attached graph*
Step-by-step explanation:
y = -2x - 3
4y + x = 16
4y + x = 16
4(-2x - 3) + x = 16
-8x - 12 + x = 16
-7x - 12 = 16
+12 + 12
-7x = 28
/-7 /-7
x = -4
4y + x = 16
4y + (-4) = 16
4y - 4 = 16
+ 4 + 4
4y = 20
/4 /4
y = 5
(x,y) -> (-4,5)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
translate to English please
Step-by-step explanation:
so confused
Answer:
The monopolist's net profit function would be:

Step-by-step explanation:
Recall that perfect price discrimination means that the monopolist would be able to get the maximum price that consumers are willing to pay for his products.
Therefore, if the demand curve is given by the function:

P stands for the price the consumers are willing to pay for the commodity and "y" stands for the quantity of units demanded at that price.
Then, the total income function (I) for the monopolist would be the product of the price the customers are willing to pay (that is function P) times the number of units that are sold at that price (y):

Therefore, the net profit (N) for the monopolist would be the difference between the Income and Cost functions (Income minus Cost):
