Answer:
understanding the causes of behavior requires looking at the environmental factors that produce them.
Explanation:
Behavior modification is a therapeutic process that is focused on changing any undesirable negative behavior in an individual through the use of positive or negative consequence and biofeedback.
Behavior modification is typically based on operant conditioning principles, through negative or positive reinforcement, undesirable behaviors developed by an individual are mainly replaced with more desirable ones.
Behavior modification can also be used to correct human behaviors or disorders such as enuresis (bed-wetting), Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), generalized anxiety disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), phobias, etc.
From the behaviorist perspective, understanding the causes of behavior or behavioral changes in living organisms require attentively studying or looking at the environmental factors such as predators, family, competition for food, climate change, sex mates, etc., that produce them.
Both moral reasoning and moral reflection yield conclusions about what should or should not done; these conclusions are called moral judgements
Our ability to make decisions based on logic or on intuition both play a role in judgment. To evaluate situations, actions, people, behavior, etc., one makes moral judgments, which are judgments with a moral underpinning.
According to some, moral judgments are frequently founded on intuition or feeling, which is typically connected to the emotions. This theory of moral judgment holds that conscious thought has no bearing on the moral conclusion.
Moral judgments, according to intuitionists, are often connected to emotions and are based on intuition or feeling. Numerous sources of evidence are cited by intuitionists to bolster their viewpoint.
As an illustration, moral judgments frequently involve moral reasoning that occurs "after the fact." As a result, we frequently make moral decisions hastily and based solely on our initial impressions.
Learn more about moral judgments here
brainly.com/question/15392471
#SPJ4
<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Why is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model but NOT in the classical model?
A) The Keynesian model assumes that the level of real GDP is inflexible.
B) The Keynesian model assumes that people work for motives other than those of earning an income for themselves and supporting a family.
C) The Keynesian model assumes that workers can lose their jobs to foreign competition during economic downturns.
D) The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward.
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward - is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The classical model is quite the usual microeconomic principles. Keynes claimed that the classical model is not common. In the classical model, the basis for the rationalizing is notional demand and supply, which implies market equilibrium. Keynes proposed the idea of aggregate demand, the overall demand for products and services in the economy.
Keynes supposed that the unemployment force persists regularly. Keynes was suspicious that the economic dominance of demand and supply drive the economy to a common equilibrium. Rising government spending or cutting taxes will boost aggregate demand.
<u />
Answer:
The reasons included future protection, expansion, prosperity and the mystery of unknown lands
Explanation:
The term that aristotle used to refer to using evidence and reasoning to reach a conclusion is<u> "logos".</u>
Logos (Logical) implies influencing by the utilization of thinking. This will be the most imperative strategy we will study, and Aristotle's top choice. We'll take a gander at deductive and inductive thinking, and examine what makes a viable, powerful motivation to back up your cases. Giving reasons is the core of argumentation, and can't be accentuated enough. We'll think about the kinds of help you can use to substantiate your proposition, and take a gander at a portion of the regular coherent errors, keeping in mind the end goal to maintain a strategic distance from them in your composition.
