There are 52 weeks in a year right.
So in three years there are 156 weeks.
Now we are gonna multiply the saving amount per week, $62.50 by the 156 weeks.
$62.50 x 156 = $9,750
This is the amount that you put in your saving in three years.
Answer:
Yes, these facts are valid against Hannah which comes under Ratification Doctrine.
Explanation:
Here in the question its given that Hannah had allowed her friend to lend her computer for a one week period which was during her thanks giving break.
During those times Carol sold that laptop to a friend which was one of them in their class without asking hannah about this.
Now when after the break hannah and carol both return then carol told her that she had sold her laptop because she was getting an amount from the buyer which was too good to pass up so shesold it that moment.
Now when she gave that money to Hannah she instead of scolding her thanked her and her expression was seeming to be like she had done an awsome job for her.
So, based on the facts the contract was valid because it came under Ratification Doctrine.
Strategic planning
Explanation:
Process to identify the external and internal conditions of the organisation, determine a strategy and goal, formulate general goals, establish and choose general approaches, and allocate resources for the organization's objectives.
Strategic planning is the method of documenting and guiding the small company— by evaluating where they are and where they're going. The strategic plan actually provides them with the opportunity to record the mission, vision and principles and their lengthy-term goals and intervention plans to achieve them.
Answer:
Economist A
Explanation:
Elasticity is a measure of investment sensitivity. If the investment is elastic, a slight increase in price (interest rate) will decrease the amount of investment. Conversely, if the investment is inelastic, a change in interest rates will not considerably affect the investment rate. The calculation of elasticity consists of the change in the investment rate divided by the change in the interest rate. If the calculation of elasticity is less than 1, it is considered ineastic, while investments with elasticity above 1 are considered elastic. Thus, economist A believes that the investment rate is elastic to the interest rate, while economist B believes the opposite. So for economist A the rise in interest rates will affect the investment rate of the economy (and hence the macroeconomic environment) because in his view investment is elastic. Economist B does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will affect demand for investments.
