Read the passage from A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. That the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution
is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. Does Wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? Yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” Yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” No, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” No, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”
In the passage from A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, Wollstonecraft maintains an objective tone in the passage. As the correct answer is "<span>No because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”</span>Mary Wollstonecraft was an English author and a proponent of women’s rights. She has a masterpiece called A Vindication of the Rights of Women.
Answer: D) No, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”
Explanation: something subjective is something based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions (it is the antonym of objective) In the given passage from "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman" we can see that the speaker doesn't mantain an objective tone in the passage, because of language such as "absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense" where she expresses her feelings and opinions.
