Daoists believed people should find their own way to live in peace and that people must learn to live with their own feelings too
Answer:
D). Unconscionable
Explanation:
Unconscionable is a precept in contract law which depicts the extremely immoral, oppressive, or unjust laws as obstructive to good conscience. These laws overwhelmingly favor one party of the contract due to its superiority in bargaining abilities.
As per the question, the provision of 'landlord's authority to cut off heat or water' in a residential lease exemplifies such immoral or outrageous laws that can outrage the sensibility or conscience of the courts and courts have the complete authority to refuse the enforcement of such unjust laws. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
The answer is that the federal system provides us the best
of both worlds because they were the ones who could provide in making a system
more organized and fair as they divide those of local governments and national
governments. In which, this is an advantage towards citizens and the people in
this system.
The concept of a good argument is of course quite vague, if
an argument has only one or more false premises, then it is not a good
argument. Unless the premises of an argument are all true, then it would have
no reason to accept to accept its conclusion. In my line of my work In Home Health
Care there is always a good argument to go on.