Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
In simple words, the problem depicted in the given scenario is an example of low knowledge of the target audience. In the given case, the company did everything correct with respect to their procedures, like they made a question are in the local language and distributed to the target audience and collected the survey efficiently.
However while doing the procedure, they were unaware of the fact that their target audience was not literate enough. Hence we can conclude that the correct answer is D.
Answer:
Minimize is the correct answer for plato users
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation: The Securities and Exchange Commission
