Answer and Explanation:
In an action based on strict liability, a plaintiff must show that
(1) a product was defective,
(2) the defendant was in the business of distributing the product,
(3) the product was unreasonably dangerous due to the defect,
(4) the plaintiff suffered harm,
(5) the defect was the proximate cause of the harm, and
(6) the goods were not substantially changed from the time they were sold.
A plaintiff does not have to show that there was a failure to exercise due care, and this distinguishes an action based on strict liability from an action based on negligence, which requires proof of a lack of due care. If Bob establishes his case, the court in this problem is most likely to rule in his favor, because the manufacturer is strictly liable in this case. Strict liability allows a plaintiff to recover damages for injuries resulting from product defects without proof of fault.
<span>The natural rate of unemployment will drop in this instance. By increasing spending and/or decreasing taxes, aggregate demand is boosted, leading to more people being employed to meet the demand. This moves the natural rate of employment out to a greater level than previously experienced.</span>
Answer:
This is very simple, they should start billing their clients right away.
You don't have to bill your clients for the full legal expenses, but they for sure need to start making some money.
It is very normal that new businesses don't get enough revenue to cover their operation expenses right away. Even for big corporations, like Amazon and FB, it may take years to reach the break even point.
When you open a business you have to keep some money as reserve to cover some expenses for at least a few months.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The reason is that the Internation Financial Reporting Framework says that though there are choices the company must opt to the depreciation method that brings fairness to the financial statement, which means that the method used calculates the depreciation for the year that actually represents the decrease in the value of the assets in market value. So if the current method brings the fairness to the Financial statements, Lucky can use them and if those don't bring fairness to the financial statements then its better to use alternative which will bring the fairness to financial statements.
Answer:
am sorry plz write your question in English
