Question

A newspaper advice columnist suggests that thinking can be voluntarily controlled and changed but that emotions are gut-level, biological reactions that can't be voluntarily controlled or modified. use your knowledge of emotion research and theory to either support or refute the columnist's claim.

Answer 1

I concur with the reporter proclamation. Scholars trust that it is halfway psychological, gut level, and it includes more than our reasoning and thinking. For instance when I get anxious my heart rate goes up and my hands can begin to shake. I didn't deliberately influence my hands to shake or cause my heart rate to expand; it was driven by my feeling of apprehension. I will state that reasoning can make these feelings fly up yet that isn't generally the case. Feeling is a reaction of the entire organism, including physiological excitement, expressive practices, and cognizant experience. Emotions can now and again be controlled through training and poise.

Answer 2

Answer:

The columnist is correct.

Explanation:

Thought is that which is brought into existence through intellectual activity. For this reason, it can be said that thought is a product of the mind, which can arise through rational activities of the intellect or abstractions of the imagination. For this reason, we can agree with the columnist that thoughts are something voluntarily controlled and altered depending on the situation in which they are inserted.

An emotion is a set of chemical and neural responses based on emotional memories that arise when the brain receives an external stimulus. Emotions are not voluntarily controlled or modified, they arise involutely due to a situation. For this reason, we can conclude that the columnist is correct once again.