Based on the choices of the, and if we arrange that, here is the sequence.
1. The bill is introduced in Congress.
2. The bill passes in both houses.
3. The bill is send to the president.
4. The president signs or vetoes the bill.
It is assumed that, following the sequence, then the second step in the bill process is "The bill passes in both houses."
Answer:
Towns developed near oases because they were a source of water and they need water to live and so do animals. They also can settle to farm and get food, bathing, etc
Explanation:
Answer:
Asteroids
Explanation:
Much of our earth's water supply comes from the asteroids.
More research done suggested that much of the earth's water is being delivered by the asteroids.
The origin of earth's water can be tracked down by analyzing the ratio of the two isotopes of hydrogen molecule. On isotope is the ordinary hydrogen and the other is the deuterium.
Research and study suggests that there is a close match between the earth water's ratio of deuterium to hydrogen to that of the asteroids, which is rich in water and elements such as nitrogen and carbon.
Thus the answer is --- "Asteroids"
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
Answer:
C) in the second condition more words are recalled
Explanation:
In the second coding, the research participants' memory is helped, when some words from the list are cited. This can cause the participants to remember a greater amount of words than the amount that was remembered in the first condition. This is because in the first condition the participants had no help to quote the memorized words, having to rely on only the own memory.
