Answer:
Based merely on "out of water," this is a prepositional phrase.
Explanation:
"Out" is an adverb (an adverb asks what, where, when) because out answers the question of what. "Of" is a preposition and "water" is the object of the preposition.
Answer:
When writing a paper, information is not written randomly as it is found. Instead, information is organized into logical groups or sections allowing for an easier flow of the paper.
<h2>inverted text pyramid</h2>
Is done by stating the most important information first, followed by the supporting and less important information
Is also known as “front loading”
Front loading is commonly seen and used in newspaper articles or history papers.
The details from the passage support the central idea include:
- "o’erstep not the modesty of nature"
- "anything so overdone is from the purpose of playing"
- "to hold to the mirror up to nature"
<h3>What is a central idea?</h3>
In literature, a central idea simply means the main idea that's conveyed in a literary work by the author.
In this case, the details from the passage that support the central idea are illustrated above. This is important for the literary work.
Learn more about central idea on:
brainly.com/question/2684713
#SPJ4
I'm pretty sure that the narrator of " The tell-tale Heart' views his disease positively, and that the narrator of " The black Cat" is the opposite.
Answer: Anger is an ineffective way for people get their points across. The following reasons are why. In the protests that have been going on many people have been showing their anger by robbing and vandalizing businesses by doing this they not only are ruining the city but also getting themselves in trouble by getting arrested. Martin Luther King Jr not once used violence to get his point across but he instead protested peacefully and with peace and he inspired people to follow him and they did at the end he changed many people's minds and got his point across. This shows that people don't need violence or anger to get there point through because there have been true examples showing us that you could still get what you want without getting angry. The last reason why I think that anger is ineffective is the following. Let me give this example, if you were to see a person who would yell, always be angry and want to start a fight with someone and they told you that there way of doing things was right would you listen to them? On the other hand if you were to see a person who talked calm tried to listen to others and gave good reason of their decision would you listen to them? It's exactly what going on if people protest with anger and violence they would not listen to them or not have much attention to them but if we act with calmness and patience they will acknowledge us and try to get to know our beliefs and thoughts.
Explanation: My 3 reasons simplified are if you use anger you will receive anger back, there have been real examples that actually work and changed people in where they did not use anger and it still worked basically it's been proved that even though you do not use anger it still works.My last reason is that you have to think about it, would you listen to people who use anger and violence or would you listen to people who are calm and patient and inspire other people with truth and kindness.
