I feel as if this is something you personally think about it. In my opinion, as a person everyone creates a story based on what they KNOW about them selves, you ask yourself a question and you answer within .5 seconds because you already have answers about yourself. In your head you build up a story because of all the facts you already know
<span>Jem is angry with Mr. Davies' angry at Attika, so it destroys the camellia bush. She destroys them with the Scout baton. </span><span>The only explanation of Scout's on Jem's action is that he went mad. We all have the extent and limit of abuse of the words that we can take. James received negative comments from his children about his father's days, but never adults. </span><span>When Mrs. Dubose said, "Your father is better [...] that works for him!" Jem lost it. Interestingly, Jem walked to the store and bought a steam engine and baton with joy, but accumulated negative energy in him. He probably thought of his action while in the store until his anger was out of control. </span>
Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
Answer is B population growth
