The average rate of change between 1991 and 1996 is 40 million
<h3>How to determine the average rate of change between 1991 and 1996?</h3>
The given parameters are:
Population in 1991 = 1.5 billion
Population in 1996 = 1.7 billion
The average rate of change between 1991 and 1996 is calculated as:
Rate = (1.7 billion -1.5 billion)/(1996 - 1991)
Evaluate
Rate = 40 million
Hence, the average rate of change between 1991 and 1996 is 40 million
Read more about average rate of change at
brainly.com/question/8728504
#SPJ1
Answer:
x=26°
Step-by-step explanation:
3x-14+x+90=180
4x-14=90
4x=104
x=104/4
x=26°
Answer:
Hello
Step-by-step explanation:
The domain is limited with 2 lines parallel: -1 ≤ x ≤ 1
and the disk ? (inside of a circle) of center (0,0) and radius 2

Answer:
Around 5.5 square meters
Step-by-step explanation:
You can start by finding the area of the segment. Since the rest of the circle that is not in the segment is 240 degrees, the segment is 120 degrees or a third of the circle. You can therefore find the area of that segment with the formula
square meters. Now, you need to find the area of the triangle inside the sector. This is more difficult than last time, because it is not a 90 degree angle. However, you can solve this by dividing this triangle into two 30-60-90 triangles, which you know how to find the ratio of sides for. In a 30-60-90 triangle, the hypotenuse is twice the length of the smallest leg, and the larger leg is
times larger than the smaller leg. In this case, these dimensions are a base of
for the smaller leg and
for the larger leg, or the base. Using the triangle area formula and multiplying by 2 (because remember, we divided the big triangle in half), you get
square meters. Subtracting this from the area of the segment, you get about 5.5 square meters. Hope this helps!

A=10, B=11, C=12, etc.


Now, the "only" thing that remains to do is solving the above equation.
While making this problem I only made sure it has a solution. I didn't try to solve it myself and I didn't know it will end up with such "convoluted" polynomial. Sorry to everyone who tried to solve it... m(_ _)m
I think the best way to approach it is using the rational root theorem since we know that
. Moreover we can deduce that
since there is
and
.
After you succesfully solve it, you should get the answer
.