The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
Answer:
What do you need?? Oh oops I just wasted an answer, I'm so sorry
Explanation:
Answer:
Jonathan Edwards
Explanation:
Sinners in the hands of an angry god
