Question

Kristina Bishop was charged with a third offense of driving under the influence (DUI), a felony. She had twice previously entered into diversion agreements when charged with DUI. A diversion agreement is a contract with the state providing conditions the defendant must fulfill. When entered to avoid criminal prosecution for DUI, a diversion agreement is considered a prior conviction. Bishop had signed the first diversion agreement a year and a half before she became 18. She was almost six years beyond the age of majority at the time of third charge. She argued that the first diversion was voidable, that she was disaffirming , and therefore the first diversion agreement could not count as a prior conviction. Was she correct

Answer 1

Answer: yes she was correct

IExplanation: