Answer:
Mean weight gained of two goods is not significantly different under 0.05 or 0.01 significance level, but it is under 0.10 significance level.
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to calculate the z-statistic of the differences of sample means and compare if it is significant under a significance level.
Z-score can be calculated using the formula:
z=
where
- X is the mean weight gain for in the first three months after birth for babies using the Gibbs products.
- Y is the mean weight gain for in the first three months after birth for babies using the competitor products
- s(x) is the population standard deviation of the sample for Gibbs brand
- s(y) is the population standard deviation of the sample for competitor brand
- N(x) is the sample size for babies used Gibbs product
- N(y) is the sample size for babies used competitor product.
putting the numbers in the formula:
z=
≈ -1.51
and z-table gives that P(z<-1.51) = 0.0655
To conclude if the competitor good is significantly better, we need to choose a significance level and compare it to 0.0655.
For example, the difference in mean weight gained of two goods is not significant under 0.05 or 0.01 significance since 0.0655 is bigger than these values. But we can conclude that under 0.10 significance, competitor brand mean weight gain is significantly more than the Gibbs brand mean weight gain.
Find out how much over the 10 years whatever it says and then use that to explain if it's worth is
Answer:
- $38,500
- $1,400
Step-by-step explanation:
1. According to the Accrual Principle of Accounting, revenue should only recognized when the goods or services for which it was paid for have been delivered. In other words, revenue should only be recognized when earned.
As of December 1, 20X1, Ginzel had only completed 7 of the 20 reports so the revenue recognized should be for the completed reports alone.
Total revenue for 20 reports = $110,000
Revenue for 7 reports = 7/ 20 * 110,000
= $38,500
2. The Accrual principle also applies to expenses and states that expenses should only be accounted for when incurred. As the $4,000 relates to all the reports, it should be apportioned evenly.
The costs of extraction and conversion of data for the year should therefore be;
= 7/20 * 4,000
= $1,400
Answer:
-1
Step-by-step explanation: