Carbon is an integral part of many biological processes. Living things use carbon throughout their system. Plants need carbon to go through photosynthesis. People give off carbon through cellular respiration. Hope this was somewhat helpful
<span>The correct answer is C. Family. That is because the only things smaller than family are genus and species and they are not mentioned here. Life and domain are larger than kingdom and kingdom is larger than phylum. Class and order are smaller than phylum but are larger than family. That's why your correct answer is family.</span>
<span>Correlation of Geologic Units is NOT evidence for Plate Tectonics</span>
It’s mass stays constant .weight changes depending on gravitational force
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
