The Perimeter is 15 inches <span />
Answer with explanation:
→→→Function 1
f(x)= - x²+ 8 x -15
Differentiating once , to obtain Maximum or minimum of the function
f'(x)= - 2 x + 8
Put,f'(x)=0
-2 x+ 8=0
2 x=8
Dividing both sides by , 2, we get
x=4
Double differentiating the function
f"(x)= -2, which is negative.
Showing that function attains maximum at ,x=4.
Now,f(4)=-4²+ 8× 4-15
= -16 +32 -15
= -31 +32
=1
→→→Function 2:
f(x) = −x² + 2 x − 3
Differentiating once , to obtain Maximum or minimum of the function
f'(x)= -2 x +2
Put,f'(x)=0
-2 x +2=0
2 x=2
Dividing both sides by , 2, we get
x=1
Double differentiating the function,gives
f"(x)= -2 ,which is negative.
Showing that function attains maximum at ,x=1.
f(1)= -1²+2 ×1 -3
= -1 +2 -3
= -4 +2
= -2
⇒⇒⇒Function 1 has the larger maximum.
Answer:
true
The height of Mount Everest is times the height of a waterfall.
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
The correct answers would be a b and 2 because I don’t know this is a test to be honestly
