1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Basile [38]
3 years ago
6

Using the bomb saved lives by bringing a quick end to a war that might have gone on for years longer. It is impossible to put a

number on how many more deaths the continuing war might have caused, but there are indications. Millions had already died in the Pacific theater. Whenever US troops invaded an island, they knew the fight was to the death. In the battle for Okinawa alone, there had been almost 50,000 US casualties, while Japan had suffered some 90,000 military deaths and at least 100,000 civilian deaths. Of course, radiation continued to cause illness, misery, and death long after the bomb had been dropped.
How should the author revise this paragraph?
by using more conversational sentences
by placing a topic sentence at the beginning
by providing details and statistics as evidence
by moving and refuting the counterclaim at the end
History
2 answers:
Degger [83]3 years ago
8 0

the correct answer is D



by moving and refuting the counterclaim at the end


by providing a contradictory statement in the conclusion without offering a counterclaim the authors views are rendered unreliable because he seems to contradict himself. A conclusion to a topic should be used to reaffirm the main idea and not to contradict it.

Lena [83]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D. by moving and refuting the counterclaim at the end.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ASAP THANK YOU
iragen [17]
I believe the answer is it’s c
4 0
2 years ago
A difference between Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X was that Martin Luther King Jr. believed in using violence to achieve
Ann [662]
Is this a true or false? if so, it is false because martin luther king did not believe in violence. he believed in peaceful protests
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does Malcolm X not approve of Martin Luther King Jr.’s approach to securing civil rights?
natima [27]

Malcom X wanted people to go back to Africa or from a whole different country without white people in it. Martin Luther King on the other hand wanted non-violent protests to try to get rid of the awful segregation. King said this about malcom x's civil rights movements. "a bunch of thugs organized from prisons and jails and financed, I am sure, by some Arab group." They both wanted the same thing which was freedom but one wanted to integrate with white people, and the other one didn't.

4 0
3 years ago
Railroad mileage disadvantage
soldi70 [24.7K]
Outdated technology
5 0
2 years ago
Please be quick, I need this as soon as possible!
jasenka [17]

Answer:

I believe the answer is D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following government types reflects Charles de Montesquieu's philosophy of government?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the name of the club that jobs and woz liked to go to?
    6·2 answers
  • How does a voter vote
    10·2 answers
  • Which term describes the view that all bill of rights protections should apply to the states
    8·2 answers
  • In which neighborhoods were immigrants who stayed in cities most likely to settle?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately describes an advantage help by one side at the beginning of the civil war? A: the north’s army had ma
    10·2 answers
  • I'M STUCK SOMEONE PLEASE HELP! NO COPYING AND PASTING
    6·1 answer
  • Which two actions can humans take to prepare for a hurricane?
    5·2 answers
  • PLS HURRY I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    13·2 answers
  • 1. According to the Constitution, how many people represent each state in the Senate?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!