I’m confuse between A and B but I think it is mostly B
Answer:
I would predict that the the following generation will have a large amount of pups that are eaten by the sharks.
This question seems like its asking about natural selection.
"Natural selection is the process when organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring"
Explanation:
If the marine biologist did not give the pups medicine in the first generation, the pups that were less fit or not adaptive to the enviroment to naturally survive the infections would have died. This would have prevented these pups from passing on their genes.
The next generation would consists of pups that are more immune to the sickness or more fit for their enviroment and might experiece less pups to die.
<span>potential energy
the energy possessed by a body by virtue of its position relative to others, stresses within itself, electric charge, and other factors.</span>
Let's think of it like this. We have an energy crisis, but how can we solve it? There are three steps. First, we need to recognize that we HAVE a problem that needs to be fixed. Then, we need to determine what's causing the problem. Finally, we need to change how we act in order to solve the problem. Now, let's look at the options.
Is A correct, leaving our behavior unchanged? NO: if we know the cause of the problem, we still need to solve it! What about B: the problems are ignored? NO: you can't solve a problem unless you know it's a problem. C? NO: to solve a problem, you need to find out what's causing it. Finally, let's look at D: behavior is changed after cause is identified. This is correct: not only do we know why it's happening, but we're fixing it!
Answer: D