Answer:
C. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
The case of Marbury v. Madison determined the power that the judicial branch of the government can have to limit the power of the legislative branch of the government.
Prior to the case, the congress can basically pass any laws that they want without any repercussion.
The case granted the Supreme court with the power of judicial review. This enable the supreme court to examine every laws proposed by Congress before its passed. The supreme court can rejected the proposal and prevented it from becoming actual law if it violated any part of the constitutions.
Answer:
social psychology is the correct answer
Explanation:
please follow me
Doctors
Engineers
Teachers
Scientists
Social Workers
1) <span>The Equator is located (defined) as being at zero degrees north latitude.
The North Pole is located at 90 degrees north latitude.
Therefore, half of the distance from the equator to the north pole would be the line of latitude at 45 degrees north.
This would be quite close to the latitude of Montreal, Quebec, Canada at 45 degrees 30 minutes north latitude.
2) </span><span>The Prime Meridian is defined as being zero degrees west (or east) longitude. </span>
<span>80 degrees west longitude would be quite close to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania which is located at 79 degrees 57 minutes west of Greenwich, England. </span>
<span>The halfway line of longitude would be 40 degrees west longitude. </span>
<span>The city of Rio De Janeiro, Brazil is located approximately 43 degrees west longitude. </span>
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.