Answer:
Debit Notes Receivable for $86,000; credit Cash $86,000
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the cash loan is given below;
Notes Receivable $86,000
To Cash $86,000
(Being cash loan is recorded)
Here the note receivable is debited as it increased the assets and credited the cash as it decreased the assets
Therefore the first option is correct
Answer:
Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Explanation:
Old Net profit margin = Net income/ Revenue
= $10,600/$205,000
= 5.170731707%
Old ROE = Net profit margin*Asset turnover*Equity multiplier
= 0.0517*1.33*1.75
= 12.03487805%
New net income = $10,600 + $10,250
= $20,850
New net profit margin = $20,850/$205,000
= 10.17073171%
New ROE = 0.1017*1.33*1.75
= 23.67237805%
Change in ROE = New ROE – Old ROE
= 23.67237805% - 12.03487805%
= 11.6375%
Therefore, Had it cut costs and increased its net income by this amount, The ROE would have changed 11.64%.
Since you provide no options, one of the form of welfare that gives direct payments to recipients is : DPDP
Which stands for Direct payments demonstration Projects
hope this helps
Answer:
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
Yes, as long as the assignment does not increases the burden on Max.
Yes, Claire can assign her obligations under the contract to anyone who accepts.
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
No, the assignment is not valid since Max did not give any consideration.
This is most likely not a good strategy for this woman. The fact that this woman has been hired as a freelance web designer means thta the woman is beig paid for her professional expertise. No one else can perform the job in the way that she can perform it. Therefore, she cannot assign this duty to another person.
