Answer:
Testimonial evidence
Explanation:
Testimonial evidence is evidence provided by people who were in the vicinity of the area where the case was located, and who, under oath, assure that they saw or heard something related to the case.
In the question, we have a typical example of testimonial evidence because a witness is assuring that he saw the defendant in the area that is related to the case, but is not necessarily providing any other type of evidence to support that claim. Whether the testimony is considered truthful or not, or relevant or not, depends on the context of the case, and on the ultimate decision of the jury.
Internet theft of service is considered a misdemeanor crime in many states, punishable by monetary fines and possible jail sentences. Other crimes, such as Internet piracy or Internet identity theft may be treated more seriously.
Majority of religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
<h3>What is a
democracy system?</h3>
It is a government system where the laws, policies, leadership of the state are directly or indirectly decided by the people,
Hence, the religious organizations preferred the democracy system of government because it is a system that listens to the citizens for what need to be done.
Read more about democracy system
<em>brainly.com/question/3710021</em>
#SPJ1
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
