I believe B as they have a right to testy if they want to but the lawyer just shut him down in fear of losing the case so it could be either unethical or illegal
Answer: The best question to ask the victim would be: What were the most noticeable features about the robber's face?
Explanation:
Because of the violent nature of the crime of robbery and the imminent threat of injury, witnesses are not likely to remember many specific details of a robbery.
It is important, however, that officers attempt to gather as much information as possible from the victim and any witnesses.
In such cases, the best question to ask the victim in order for him to disclose any details that may help identify the suspect is to ask of the most noticeable features about the suspect's face.
Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
The renowned Greek general Pericles was the one that made the speech that said that If we took to the laws they afford equal justice to all in their private differences.
<h3>What is the meaning of this speech?</h3>
This is the speech that tells us that the law is supposed to have the same opportunities for all persons. That is no one had to be treated in a different manner by the law.
From the speech that this was given was the funeral oration that was given for the soldiers that fell in the Peloponnesian War. The goal of the speech was to persuade the people that were listening to him.
In the speech he had tp praise Athens as a way of helping to encourage them so that they would have to continue fighting in this war.
Read more on Pericles here:
brainly.com/question/894806
#SPJ1
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question.
Explanation:
Yeah, We agree with the North Carolina Court the decision that 5 Stars was an independent consultant. AAA does hire and fir five Stars staff, who may not evaluate all staff to see if their company is fit. they will not. AAA employed 5 Star in the name of the rental agency and was not responsible for its and other businesses. It is an employer, that is a consultant regardless of who determines to work. Decided to hire that work or even the independent contractor the company that had hired an independent contractor. We employ people as they already have the training to do a work, which the organization has completed, this is like recruiting an employment agency. I don't think companies avoid liability.
