1) cost per child = 400
2) cost per child for these additional 20 children = 460/ 20 = $ 23
3) the average cost per child = (400 + 460)/ 21 = 860 / 21 = $ 40. 952
4) The above result show that the cost of polio vaccine is less which is only $23. But the setting up immunization program & other necessary associated works have adds up to a higher cost of $ 40. 952. This can be reduced if more nos. of children are involved in the immunization program.
Also, the cost of setting up immunization program will be same for one child or more than one. Only the cost of polio vaccine will vary when the nos. of participating will increase.
Answer:
$62,000
Explanation:
Calculation to Determine Barnaby's basis at the end of the tax year
Using this formula
Ending tax year Barnaby's basis in the partnership=[BBB Partnership basis+( Share of debt-Share of partnership debt)+ Share of Partnership's income +Share of partnership's nontaxable income-Cash distributions]
Let plug in the formula
Ending tax year Barnaby's basis in the partnership =$50,000 + ($8,000-$5,000) + $20,000 + $1,000 - $12,000
Ending tax year Barnaby's basis in the partnership =$50,000 + $3,000 + $20,000 + $1,000 - $12,000
Ending tax year Barnaby's basis in the partnership = =$62,000
Therefore Barnaby's basis at the end of the tax year will be $62,000
Answer:
Income will increase by $5 per unit
Explanation:
The income effect in case of the order accepted is presented below:
As we know that
Additional sales per unit $32
Direct material per unit $12
Direct labor per unit $9
And, the incremental variable overhead cost is $6 per unit
Since the fixed cost is the same so it does not affect the effect on income
So, the income effect would be
= $32 - $12 - $9 - $6
= $5 per unit
Since the answer comes in positive which means there is an increase in income
Answer:
C. The importance of secondary effects
Explanation:
Secondary economic impact is a study of economic activities due to recurring rounds of spending by companies, households, and the government.
Secondary effects are long term and comes after the primary effect (first round of spending).
It is also called induced economic effect.
Answer:
review your progress, reevaluate, and revise your plan
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the step that you have completely neglected is to review your progress, reevaluate, and revise your plan. That is because in this scenario many events have occurred, and it seems that your financial plan after retirement has not been adjusted with each and every one of these life events. Therefore it is outdated and most likely not providing the benefits it once did.
